The U.S. and Israel have initiated discussions with officials from three East African regions—Sudan, Somalia, and the self-declared independent territory of Somaliland—about possibly hosting Palestinians displaced by the ongoing Israeli occupation in Gaza. This move aligns with former President Donald Trump’s postwar proposal, which envisions relocating Gaza’s population elsewhere while transforming the region into a development project under American oversight.
While Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has publicly supported this plan of ethnic cleansing, Palestinian communities and Arab nations have strongly rejected it, labeling it forced displacement. Human rights organizations have also warned that such actions could constitute war crimes.
Diplomatic Outreach and Reactions
Officials from Sudan confirmed that the U.S. had proposed the idea, offering military aid and financial incentives in return for cooperation. However, Sudan’s leadership swiftly declined, reaffirming their stance against any forced removal of Palestinians.
Meanwhile, representatives from Somalia and Somaliland have denied knowledge of formal negotiations. Despite this, sources suggest that the U.S. may leverage diplomatic recognition as a bargaining tool to gain Somaliland’s support.
Strategic Considerations and Incentives
The approach mirrors Trump’s previous diplomatic efforts, such as the Abraham Accords, which sought to normalize relations between Israel and several Arab nations. By offering financial aid, military assistance, and diplomatic recognition, the U.S. and Israel aim to secure agreements with potential host countries.
However, the feasibility of this plan remains uncertain, as Somalia maintains a strong pro-Palestinian stance, and Somaliland continues to seek international legitimacy. Sudan, embroiled in civil conflict, appears unwilling to participate despite potential economic benefits.
Global Criticism and Legal Concerns
The proposal has been met with widespread condemnation from Arab states and international human rights organizations. Critics argue that any attempt to forcibly relocate Gaza’s population violates international law and disregards Palestinian sovereignty.
Despite the backlash, Trump and Netanyahu’s administrations remain committed to exploring relocation options, emphasizing what they call a “voluntary” migration strategy. However, with resistance from Palestinian communities and limited cooperation from potential host nations, the plan faces significant obstacles.