The Algerian Ministry of Foreign Affairs has summoned ambassadors from several European nations to clarify their reactions to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruling on agricultural and fisheries agreements with Morocco. This diplomatic move underscores Algeria’s concern over the ruling’s impact on its relations with both the EU and Morocco, which have been historically strained.
Although the specific countries involved in these discussions have not been disclosed, most of the summoned ambassadors reportedly clarified that their comments were not intended to reject the Court’s decisions or disregard them in the future. This reflects the careful stance European nations are taking in response to the ruling, mindful of the sensitivity surrounding the issue.
Some ambassadors were also surprised by the European Commission’s statement, which appeared to prioritize the rights of contractors over the rulings of the EU’s highest court. This situation highlights the complex balance between trade interests and legal obligations, a challenge with significant implications for international relations in the region.
For further context, Moroccan Foreign Minister Nasser Bourita revealed on October 8 that 19 countries have voiced support for Morocco’s partnership with the EU. He emphasized that the ECJ ruling is separate from the statements made by the European Commission and these countries. This widespread backing of Morocco may further complicate Algeria’s diplomatic position as it seeks to navigate its ties with both Morocco and the European bloc.
In response, Algeria has strongly condemned the EU’s backing of its strategic partnership with Morocco. Foreign Minister Ahmed Attaf expressed astonishment at the EU’s prioritization of trade agreements over key principles of international law. Attaf accused the EU of favoring its strategic ties with Morocco while seemingly ignoring the rights of the Sahrawi people to exploit their own resources.
This situation continues to reflect the ongoing tensions between Algeria and Morocco, particularly regarding issues of sovereignty and resource rights. The evolving diplomatic exchanges are expected to have broader implications for regional stability and international relations.
